|













|
October 23rd 2003: DESPAIR
AND THE LONG DEFEAT- REFLECTIONS ON THE TWO TOWERS
a Beyond the Shire report by Michelle
Laundhardt
After the magical introduction to Tolkien’s world in FOTR, though
the grim finale tempered it, it appeared that some weren’t ready
for the despair of The Two Towers.
For I would argue that despair, and “the long defeat,”
is what TTT is all about.
Everyone faces despair in this movie:
Merry and Pippin (“But you’re a part of this
world!”).
Eomer (“Do not trust to hope. It has abandoned these lands.”)
Eowyn (“Your words are poison!”)
Frodo (“I can’t do this, Sam.”)
Sam (“Please, won’t you help him?”)
Gollum (“Master betrayed us!”)
Legolas (“They are all going to die!”)
Aragorn (“Then I will die as one of them!”)
Theoden (“What can men do against such reckless hate?”)
Elrond (“Why do you linger when there is no hope?”)
Arwen (Elrond: “He is NOT coming back.”)
Haldir (dying, his last sight the dead Elves surrounding him.)
Faramir (“He was my brother.”)
Strangely, it seems only Gimli and Galadriel are immune. Gimli because
he refuses to give in, perhaps out of sheer Dwarf stubbornness. He
appears to give the other characters, and the audience, a rock to
cling to.
But perhaps it’s not so strange when we consider Galadriel.
Galadriel is different. She recognizes despair, but she becomes the
conscience of the Elves, and of the movie, prodding us (and Elrond)
to remember that defeat is, in the end, irrelevant. The Elves know
that win or lose, they will lose Middle-earth. The fight must continue,
regardless. (As Philippa Boyens has noted, Tolkien himself called
the Elves’ struggle “The long defeat.”)
The work of the enemy, as Tolkien noted several times in the book,
takes many guises. We see this in TTT: the direct evil of the Uruk-hai,
the indifference of the Ents, and the misguided goodness of Faramir,
who only wants to save Gondor from destruction. All appear to work
in concert against the forces of good.
Is it any wonder that, after the magic and “togetherness”
of FOTR, many people find TTT to be a downer?
The heroes in this story aren’t possessed of sunny optimism
and conventional “heroism.” They stumble. They give in
at times to despair.
When Sam spoke of the old stories, and how people had plenty of chances
to turn back, but didn’t, I thought of Luthien and Beren. Some
may argue that Beren was the greatest of Tolkien’s heroes. But
even Beren wasn’t strong and heroic ALL the time. In the pit
of Sauron, his companions died beside him. “.... King Finrod
Felagund, fairest and most beloved of the house of Finwe, redeemed
his oath; but Beren mourned beside him in despair.”
Imagine that. Even Beren, when faced with the overwhelming power of
evil, despaired. I wonder how that would have gone over in a movie?
Would we complain that Beren isn’t heroic enough?
What I love most about TTT, though, isn’t the gritty realism
of its all-too-human (even if they are Elves or Hobbits) characters.
What I love is how they manage to overcome despair. In the end, even
after all that, hope manages to win out.
As Sam said, there’s good in the world, and it’s worth
fighting for, even if that fight is ultimately lost.
And how do they do it? “Not alone,” as Eomer says, but
with help from each other.
Sam saves Frodo. Faramir saves Frodo and Sam (and by rejecting the
Ring, Middle-earth). Legolas, Gimli and Aragorn all save each other.
Eomer and Gandalf save Theoden. The Elves (and the Ents) save the
Rohirrim. Pippin and Merry save the Shire (and much more). And on
it goes.
Ironically, FOTR ended in sadness tinged with hope; TTT ends in hope
tinged with sadness. I for one can’t wait for ROTK, even though,
as Jackson has said, “There is no happy ending.”.
The
above opinions, essays and articles do not necessarily reflect that
of The New York Tolkien, its staff, members nor its affiliates.
|
|